Chapter 5: How Health Care is Organized - I

Getting the right treatment to the right people at the right time and by the right care giver

Models of Organizing Care

Primary, Secondar, & Tertiary Care

Primary: basic immediate health problems (80-90%)

Secondary: more specialized clinical care

Tertiary: management of rare and complex disorders

Organization

Dawson regionalized model: emphesizes primary care and works upwards as needed

More fluid model: allows patients to go where they please, puts emphasis on the tertiary care experties

The Regionalized Model: The British National Health Service

Primary care level dominated by GPs (2/3 of all physicians in the UK)

Secondary care based on specialists who deal with patients on an ambulatory basis but refer them back to their GPs for ongoing care--also deal with hospitalized patients

Tertiary care are specialists located at a few tertiary care medical centers

All referals through GPs

The Dispersed Model: Traditional United States Health Care Organization

No limit on referals--the physician goes to any level they want whenever they want

Primary care spred amoungst specialists to a large extent

1/3 of physicians in the US are general internists or general pediatricians--well below the 50% in Cnanda--20% of patients get their primary care from non generalists

Which Model is Right?

The US system is more top heavy and costly and more disorganized and may provide worse care in some instances (low volume procedures) but it gives convienent acccess to the latest and greatest

Balancing the Different Levels of Care

Common disorders commonly occur and rare ones rarely--would suggest more GPs and fewer specialists are needed

Most people’s health care needs are at the primary care level, but most of the resources go into the tertiary and secondary care (cost)

Defining Practiioner Roles

Primary care is not so simple or basic that specialists should do it--GPs should deal with: first contact care, longitudinality (continuity), comprehensiveness, and coordination.

Good primary care improves the perception of health care

Costs lower with good and pervasive primary care through GPs

Gatekeeping & Structured patient Flow

Core function of primary care--not just to prevent access but to encourage it and manage different specialists

Accountability for Health Care

Multiple payers, fee-for-service discourages community or population based care--also no well definined and responsible gate keeper

Forces Driving the Organization of Health Care in the United States

The Biomedical Model

It has worked, dramatically!

Financial Incentives

More hospitals and specialization--less ambulatory and primary care

Initial insurance covered hospital but not physician costs (Blue Cross)--encouraged hospital expansion

Physician costs (Blue Shield) were higher for more time consuming specialist treatments, but as they became rutine the costs remained high creating an incentive to specialize

Hospital Construction Act of 1946

Medicare linked to inpatient service

Hospitals are by defeinition secondary and tertiary care institutions so their expansion did not increase primary and GP care

Professionalism

Lack of governemnt control prevented a rational system

Conclusion

Biomedical model has encouraged good science

Professional model has encouraged good doctors rather than just buisnessmen

Vast resources which can get the right care to the right patient

Does not address the needs of the whole patient--over specialization and lack of primary and preventetive and community care


Previous Chapter | Table of Contents | Next Chapter

Copyright 2000 by David Black-Schaffer